|
MAYOR OF LONDON & OTHERS -v- BABS DAY 3912: FRIDAY FEBRUARY 17TH 2012. After the police had apparently told the BBC Politics Show that they used their "discretion" to not use SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 against Democracy Village, and ignore criminal damage, below is a little reminder of what the lying dogs, Boris and Barrow Boy really said...long ago.. ....while everyone was using everything they could dream up against us. At 2mins 15sec: "the police used their "discretion" ...(to not use socpa 2005 ss 132-138 against DV...)" At 3mins 40 sec: Apparently long before I cut Boris' illegal fences, Boris claimed he began proceedings against us too, because of "criminal damage" ?? Odd that Boris did not have a go at the police also exercising their "discretion" to turn a blind eye to supposed criminal damage too ? Anyway, today we were back in the High Court because of all the lies Boris, the police and Barrow boy have told. Today we tried to find out how it is possible to - change - an Application with Notice (where you have the opportunity to file your side of the argument) that was filed by the Mayor on January 27th 2012, into an Application without Notice (that takes place without your having the opportunity to provide any defence) Well, of course today's Judge could not provide a legal basis as to how an Application could change in such a manner and so the Judge and the Mayor's QC just moved on, as they do, with whatever lies they felt like. So many lies....over so long.... And so it was useful to be reminded (see video above) how it was we ever ended up in court in the first place.... Because what is going on, really is a seriously criminal state of affairs. Well, the police et al have a lot to cover up, because they did not have the "discretion" to commit theft and so subject Babs to inhuman and degrading treatment. But as we pointed out in court, this is a state who have lied and stolen their way round the world. What was uppermost in my mind however, was not what were just another corrupt hearing. I kept thinking about what Khader Adnan is going through.....in administrative detention. Eventually in our hearing, we got to where the Judge and Mayors QC had been heading in our case... The Mayors QC had to do a lot of speaking, or rather LYING on behalf of the police and WCC. Their idea was that however it was that our tents came to be stolen, that act, of our tents being gone, somehow, gave the Mayor a reason (that was not explained) whereby he could extend his injunction to cover the kerb. The fly in the ointment, seemed to be that beyond the Public Order Act under which we are a peaceful assembly, all the state have done has been rubbish....and so our campaign ... as they were forced to admit....continues..despite their very best efforts. Quite how the Mayors injunction could continue in the face of/alongside new legislation remains a mystery of itself, but if public authorities want to hold onto any number of useless pieces of paper like some sort of security blanket, so be it. It has however reached the point where it is insulting beyond belief that individuals who really are serious criminals, intent on causing us serious harm, have the nerve to talk utter drivel in front of us, in a court. And so it came to pass that the Mayors QC was jolly lucky not to wear a carafe of water, because they really are pushing their luck. Anyway, after the hearing, (where the Judge ruled that in her opinion, it was a lot better if Babs was not able to take part in proceedings,) we went to the Admin Office in the High Court, to see if we could track down the so called injunction from January 16th 2012, that Peace Strike were supposed to have got. Well, the very fact the order we found, turned out to be dated February 7th 2012, (see below) highlighted the difficulties the state are having "offering an alternate version of reality" (lying) In essence, SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 which was used against our campaign for six years, has just been renamed the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011. And like SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138, when you work through it all, there is no actual police power of seizure. The police can issue "directions" all they like, under the new PRSR Act 2011, but the directions could never be ruled lawful and proportionate. Therefore you could never commit the criminal offence of failing to comply with a direction. And so your property could never end up in the hands of the police. Who can use zero force.... because it is not reasonable to use any force.... And when you understand all that, you wonder what the purpose of the court order purportedly made on January 16th 2012 was really about..and when you think about it....then you get it.... They all knew they had agreed an operation to steal our tents on January 16th 2012, and so they needed a hearing to publicly make up anything....be saying something..... that could act as a smokescreen...(and protect their undercover operation) because it was only ....ever....our campaign that the state are going after.  the police using that old thing, called "discretion" again...   oh and look, (below) their dutiful little trolls helpfully go along with offering an alternative view of reality (lie) "PEACE NEWS...Among other structures cleared, the peace camp set up by the late Brian Haw in 2001 was finally evicted by police on 16 January, using a new law, PRASRA (the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act, 2011), which forbids the use of camping and sleeping equipment in the square....." and this is the photo the troll Dan Viesnik took on January 19th 2012...after we have supposedly been evicted....
so let's just check back in our own photo catalogues....for January 19th 2012.... oh yeah...."police impose "condition" of sleep deprivation...." and we are definately all still there...  yep ...this is january 19th 2012....and we have NOT been "evicted".... so enter stage right...trolls inc...     viesnik dressed in brown shirt took picture below...  ah....waving around a piece of paper for the troll viesnik, who knew, we had not been evicted...
|
