HQ12X02075: J'ACCUSE.

DAY 4083: MONDAY AUGUST 6TH 2012.



METCRIMES: AUGUST 5TH 2006 & SEPTEMBER 4TH 2006.

Over the years the state have repeatedly sought to do anything and everything to remove our campaign.

They do not like people publicly refusing to be part of a system where the state say they can kill whoever they like.

The video above relates to a civil claim being brought against the police for attacking our campaign.

On July 7th 2006, I attended a meeting I was invited to with Steve Jago, at Charing Cross Police Station with a Superintendent Terry and Chief Inspector Robinson.

When they realised at the meeting that the MET were going to lose a test case against me over a new law being used against us, called SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 on September 14th 2006, they essentially tried to put the frighteners (and then some) on me.

And basically did everything they could to terrorise me.

Steve Jago and I were unlawfully arrested on July 9th 2006, which got them no-where.

Then on August 5th 2006, I was unlawfully arrested by the police who clearly could have no reasonable belief that I was obstructing any highway, when Whitehall was closed to traffic during a Stop the War Demo.

There is a large fence across the whole of Downing Street with smaller gates that lets vehicles in and out of Downing Street.

When I was arrested I was not standing in front of the gates, that open, but at the side, where we ususally stand, while no vehicles were even attempting to enter or leaving Downing Street.

So no police officer could have reasonably believed I was obstructing anything.

The video that an Inspector Wareing had edited, shows my arrest (not the lead up to it) where I am surrounded by police, before a police officer suddenly pulls handcuffs and goes for me.

While Steve Jago who was watching what was going on, was then grabbed by police, only to appear from under a mob of police, some time later, after he had been thrown onto the -concrete- by them.

So we were both "arrested".

The police then illegally held me in twisted rear stack handcuffs for around - two hours - around one hour to get to Kentish Town and one hour in a cage at the entrance to Kentish Town(ie: torture) The custody sergeant then called an FME who behaved in a sexually improper manner, while refusing to record the injuries.

On July 9th 2007, a year later, the CPS admitted that it was illegal to arrest & charge me. There never was any evidence against me.

The video above shows my answering police bail on September 4th 2006, over August 5th 2006 at Charing Cross Police Station, with Steve Jago accompanying me, because he was concerned what with what the police were doing to me.

It was illegal to charge me.

Yet, it was Inspector Wareing who had told my lawyer I would be charged when I answered bail.

Police admit that when we answered bail, they invited Steve Jago to go with me into police custody.

However, when we entered a corridor off reception, which the police claim does not have CCTV, Steve Jago was then attacked by police.

Alarmed by what had happened, the CCTV shows me flying out the door to get help for Steve Jago.

I am pursued by a vampire like Inspector Wareing who grabs me, which would have sent me flying down a flight of stairs, had I not been hanging on to a door for dear life.

Again the police CCTV at this point was edited by Inspector Wareing.

He removed the audio of what was really said.

The video then shows Steve Jago being attacked by police again in the custody area when he asks who the custody sergeant is.

Because the police have not worked out what to do with the two bodies that they are illegally holding.

Several hours later we are then arrested for obstruct pc ??

And I am held for over 30 hours while Superintendent Terry and his tossers try and work out what on earth they are going to do.

And these unlawful arrests led to a catalogue of legal proceedings and other unlawful arrests as the state continued to try to remove our campaign.

As we had the MET in the High Court over the illegal seizure in Parliament Square in May 2006.

The August 5th 2006 obstruct highway case never went ahead. However, when we walked out of City of Westminster Magistrates Court on July 9th 2007, after the case had been withdrawn, we walked straight into a police ambush where we were violently arrested all over again, and never prosecuted.

This was after we had already bizarrely been convicted at Westminster Magistrates Court in May 2007, of obstruct pc on September 4th 2006, and a unique Community Order was imposed, by District Judge Snow, where we needed the permission of the Commissioner to peacefully campaign.

When we appealed, the 4th September 2006, obstruct pc case, a fraudulent arrest warrant was then used by PC Smith, to illegally grab me during proceedings at South Western Magistrates Court, (during !! another case I subsequently won) to bring me back before Westminster Magistrates Court so they could disappear the bizarre Community Order with a fine, before it reached Southwark Crown Court on Appeal. 

Both the sentence and conviction for obstruct pc were subsequently overturned at Southwark Crown Court in December 2007. 

But not before a lot of - very serious harm - had been caused.

Below is the Commissioner of the Met police's quite dishonest response to the civil claims I made.

While I have yet to make a formal response to the Commissioner's lame defence it does provide a brief insight into the taxpayer funded corruption endemic all through a far from legal system.

The Commissioners legal team must be raking in the taxpayers money as they seek to cover up all the Commissioner's crimes.

HQ12X02075: J'ACCUSE. PARTICULARS OF CLAIM.





The Commissioner of the Mteropolitan Police actually admitted in his book Policing Controversy that he intended to remove our campaign and that reality has never changed.

And the records show that Letters of Claim in civil cases, were filed in 2008 that the MET and their legal team repeatedly refused without lawful excuse to respond to.

The police will need to explain why the police "doctor" refused to record injuries on August 5th 2006.

And I don't really mind having expert witnesses explaining how the injuries on August 5th 2006, could have arisen from anything other than torture.



On July 9th 2006, no-one was charged with unauthorised demonstration.

I was just grabbed by an - armed - police officer and never arrested for obstruct pc, which has just been made up subsequently by the Commissioner's legal team in their effort to begin to try and explain how the police came to make up assault pc, (which was only made up in the police station without thinking through what a police officer was doing touching me in the first place)






The Commissioner's legal team will have some difficulty explaining how they looked at the CCTV then wrote what they have.

And explain how I came to be charged the wilful obstruction of the free passage of Whitehall, not (as they claim) Downing Street.




6.17: There are no remaining convictions in these civil claims.

The Comissioner's legal team know that August 5th 2006, obstruct highway was dropped and the conviction for obstruct pc was overturned on appeal at Southwark Crown Court in December 2007.





The Commissioner's legal team know that if I was not arrested for an unuathorised demonstration (which I could not have been anyway, because they had our details) I could not have been lawfully arrested for obstructing a police officer...over what ?




And by the time we get to the "arrest warrant",the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police's legal team know that the conviction and sentence over obstruct pc on September 4th 2006, (of which the arrest warrant was part of) were overturned on appeal at Southwark Crown Court in December 2007.

< Prev   Next >