WEST LONDON MAGISTRATES: THE WAR CONTINUES.
DAY 4085: WEDNESDAY AUGUST 8TH 2012.
The tent trial was not concluded today.
And we think they will probably be in breach of Article 2 the Right to Life by the time it ever is.
lying dogs let sleep.
The war on the people continues.
And the state remain a cruel and inhuman establishment.
Today we forcefully made the point in court that what we are doing in Parliament Square, is upholding the law, where the state will not, as we try to stop the state committing war crimes.
No-one wanted to argue with that.
Because it is of course true.
On April 2nd 2012, some five months after the state brought in a new law to try and remove our campaign, the police stole our tents and decided to "prosecute" me.
The primary dispute over the true construction of the new, law which leads to how it is administered, still needs to be resolved.
Which is extraordinary when you think it could only be how it reads. We say it could only be read that there is the presumption of innocence and it is for the state who need to prove how I am unreasonable.
Because it is not an offence where they then say it is a defence to prove reasonable excuse.
The offence is fails without reasonable excuse to comply.
Today when the state realised it could not square the sheer volume of corruption that continued to spill out in all directions, as the trial continued, District Judge Susan Williams had to kick the case into the long grass.
Showing that of course the state has no qualms about abusing all manner of processes to continue to subject someone to inhuman and degrading treatment.
Inspector Wiles came quite a cropper trying to give a plausible explanation as to how he covered up important evidence like my reply to caution (the reasonable excuse)
And the fact that he had reported me for summons.
What seems to have happened is that Inspector Wiles began by applying the law as we would agree it is written, and then flipped to the Home Secretary's version (and then some)
Inspector Wiles had no explanation whatsoever for where our property that we are not (for the second time) being prosecuted over, such as sleeping bags and mats, are.
During the course of giving evidence, Inspector Wiles rather stupidly falsely accused me of assaulting a police officer (which rather bizarrely was his reason for my being arrested for obstruct pc) before he was later contradicted by the police officer, I allegedly assaulted, who said I did not assault him.
I put it to the police that they concocted the obstruct pc because they knew that on the proper construction of the law, where they must prove that I was unreasonable, they knew they could not seize the property prior to a conviction.
All in all Inspector Wiles did not come out of anything smelling of roses.
Inspector Wiles did however reveal that there had been instructions in emails from the highest levels to remove property which left him in no doubt that had he not, followed those orders, then he would have been asked to explain.
The District Judge could not shut me down fast enough when I was trying to say the words highest level reminded me of the words of Lord Strathclyde in Parliament, when he said pretty much the same about the highest level of government being, as the Judge conceded interested in what is happening in Parliament Square.
Acting Sergeant Guilli (Steroid Man) did not have anything useful to say beyond confirming his blind obedience to the old chestnut of following orders.
I pointed out that it is far from civilised for the state to think that they can go wherever they like rolling out the disgraceful mantra of reasonable force so that they can take whatever they like.
I pointed out to Acting Sergeant Guilli that we are actually the ones upholding law because the police will not.
I pointed out that several European Court rulings have confirmed the state acted illegally in Iraq and Afghanistan and asked how he could try and cover up our showing people like Baha Mousa were murdered by UK soldiers.
Law made him incredibly uncomfortable.
As we returned repeatedly to CCTV that was not disclosed: I said it is simply not acceptable for the state to be laying a single finger on me, over a tent.
With the arresting officer PC Apthal looking quite surprised that a woman might quite assertively object to being violently assaulted by a gang of males because they wanted her to ….freeze to death.
And pointed out that I say, that they piled in, in such a manner (and I do have some experience of being "arrested" ) that they could only have intended to cause me serious permanent harm (as they did to Brian's back) because it was so violent with a gang of male police officers attacking one woman over a piece of material.
The fact that they did not succeed does not mean they did not try.
While there were more attempts at plausible deniability - over responsibility - for anything, floating around than you could poke a stick at.
And the bizarre, became priceless, as they tried to explain arresting and -de-arresting me for stealing a tent, with the police unable to explain why they could not investigate that, with one admitting they had heard the state were running a police operation in Parliament Square.
On several occasions there was reason to ask District Judge Susan Williams why she was answering questions for the police who looked to her for help.
However, the question of the day that Steve Jago gave me had to be: "Did you know that the Secretary of State nobbled High Court Judges so that you could steal our property ?"
The question caused quite a degree of consternation in all quarters, because as I said, and I persisted in saying, I can prove it. It is serious. And a crime.
When nowt could be squared, District Judge Susan Williams then said that by September 4th 2012 the CPS must produce my reply to caution and a witness statement from PC Scott who took it.
The CCTV from Parliament Square
The CCTV from the police station from when I was charged ( I was not charged) and fingerprinted (showing the difficulty in fingerprinting me because (despite having been put on a drip in hospital) I was (still) dehydrated and had frostbite)
The CPS then decided that they would need to produce PS 4064 from December 29th 2011, because I was saying he did give an undertaking and tents were removed.
On September 11th there will be a case management hearing at West London Magistrates.
It is pretty clear that proper "disclosures" were not made.
The central idea being that in the unlikely event I was still alive on November 12th 2012, the show trial could continue.