|
MAYOR OF LONDON & "OTHERS" v TUCKER & PARLIAMENT SQUARE PEACE CAMPAIGN. DAY 3894: MONDAY JANUARY 30TH 2012.  peace strike...is not our parliament square peace campaign. From: babs tucker To: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; cccmailbox-commissioner' This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it Subject: mayor of london & "others" v tucker & parliament square peace campaign Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:56:22 +0000 ladies and gentlemen, re: The Mayor of London (Greater London Authority) v Haw & Ors [2011] EWHC 585 (QB) (17 March 2011) & prior to my response (as an "other") to the mayors application relating to the "excluded kerb" filed in the high court on january 27th 2012. it is sad that so much time and resources are spent going round in circles over proportionality, by people working for a state refusing to respect life. 1. a) could the mayor of london kindly clarify the "reason/s" by return: given the high court ruling on march 17th 2011, where our peaceful assembly/campaign of people, and property, incl. tents was found to be proportionate that the mayor now wishes to claim that not only the issue of our whole campaign having been found to be proportionate should be changed, but that issues of proportionality should not be subject to any legal scrutiny (as per Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 which is about a total ban without any legal scrutiny on "staying for any period", ...with regard only to peacefully campaigning... in parliament square) so thus the "excluded" area should come under the prsr act 2011. b) please also produce the minutes of the meeting on december 19th 2011, to which mr grinter of the gla refers in his witness statement dated 26th january 2012, where he claims the metropolitan police and westminster city council were present. 2. i refer to a video recording made with mr low of westminster city council on sunday january 29th 2012 in parliament square, where mr low was seen speaking with ms gallastegui of peace strike while referring me to wcc legal department, claiming he had no knowledge of the court order involving an agreement made between wcc, the metropolitan police and peace strike, that mr grinter claims was made on january 16th 2012 in co/12613/2011 gallastegui v wcc. (refer pic 5) could westminster city council clarify the reasons that they ignored our existing high court ruling in mayor of london v haw and others (tucker being another) march 17th 2011, where our campaign was ruled proportionate (& kindly produce a copy of the court order in co/12613/2011 gallastegui v wcc dated 16th january 2012 that the high court confirmed on friday january 27th 2012 had not yet been filed with the high court) 3. over the past few days, it has been recorded that the other campaign in parliament square, peace strike have - removed - two tents and dismantled one of their two large boxes, while placing banners relating to war with iran on the fences, while yesterday partially moving the one remaining tent, their tent..on to the kerb attached to parliament square green, which exposed a large hole that had been under their tent. the metropolitan police know that the remaining tent belongs to ms gallastegui of peace strike, and yet the police have dishonestly been briefing some police (ie from Lambeth) refer pictures "agent provocateur" 1-4 that the one remaining tent belongs to me and our campaign, which is not true. the metropolitan police commissioner is legally obliged to confirm to his staff (and myself) in writing/briefings that the tent that ms gallastegui of peace strike moved on to the kerbstone on sunday january 29th 2012, which exposed a dirty great hole under her tent…is a tent belonging to ms gallastegui and peace strike..and is not a tent belonging to our ten year 24/7 continuing parliament square peace campaign, whose tents were stolen by the police on january 16th 2012 (prior to the police responding on january 19th 2012, to my application co/12316/2011 for a judicial review of prsr act 2011 which i filed on december 16th 2011) babs tucker parliament square peace campaign www.brianhaw.tv  peace strike is not the parliament square peace campaign   the tent belongs to peace strike not our parliament square peace campaign        mr low from wcc  Subject: RE: mayor of london & "others" v tucker & parliament square peace campaign Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:05:48 +0000 From: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it To: babs tucker CC: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it Dear Mrs Tucker, The Order of Mr Justice Wyn Williams dated 17 March 2011 gave our client the specific right to apply to get the stay over the kerbstone area lifted, our client is now choosing to exercise this right. As per the terms of the Order the application will be heard on the papers only in the first instance. I confirm that there are no minutes from the meeting that took place with the Police and Westminster City Council, even if this document did exist it would not be directly relevant to the issues raised by our application dated 27 January 2012. Kind regards Rebecca Rebecca Allwood Solicitor From: babs tucker To: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it Subject: mayor of london & "others" v tucker & parliament square peace campaign Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:59:23 +0000 and all i am asking for prior to my response to a hearing on papers (incl. my "papers") only in the first instance, is the "reason/s" for the mayor applying, now. i therefore also require any contemporaneous notes/agreements, who was present from the meeting on december 19th 2011, since it must be directly relevant, because it was your mr grinter who referred to it in his witness statement dated 26th january 2012 that was included in your client, the mayors application. babs tucker
|
